Client design: add "one database per key" alternative
This commit is contained in:
parent
55613db846
commit
20486be042
|
|
@ -279,6 +279,10 @@ Supporting a wallet assumes risk. Effort required to implement wallet functiona
|
|||
- light client protocol as currently implemented requires stack assumptions
|
||||
such as protobufs and a hardcoded lightserver to talk to
|
||||
|
||||
- What about having one database per key?
|
||||
- easy to reliably delete or backup all data related to a single key
|
||||
- might use slightly more space/CPU
|
||||
- slightly harder to delete all the keys
|
||||
|
||||
# Unresolved questions
|
||||
[unresolved-questions]: #unresolved-questions
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue