Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
teor 2f0926a8e4
Stop ignoring the mempool conflicting transaction reject list size limit (#2855)
* Limit the size of rejection lists when there is a spend conflict

Previously, `insert` would return early with an error,
and skip limiting the rejection list sizes.

* Use prop_assert macros in proptests, rather than assert
2021-10-12 10:35:50 +10:00
Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho 9e78a8af40
Refactor mempool spend conflict checks to increase performance (#2826)
* Add `HashSet`s to help spend conflict detection

Keep track of the spent transparent outpoints and the revealed
nullifiers.

Clippy complained that the `ActiveState` had variants with large size
differences, but that was expected, so I disabled that lint on that
`enum`.

* Clear the `HashSet`s when clearing the mempool

Clear them so that they remain consistent with the set of verified
transactions.

* Use `HashSet`s to check for spend conflicts

Store new outputs into its respective `HashSet`, and abort if a
duplicate output is found.

* Remove inserted outputs when aborting

Restore the `HashSet` to its previous state.

* Remove tracked outputs when removing a transaction

Keep the mempool storage in a consistent state when a transaction is
removed.

* Remove tracked outputs when evicting from mempool

Ensure eviction also keeps the tracked outputs consistent with the
verified transactions.

* Refactor to create a `VerifiedSet` helper type

Move the code to handle the output caches into the new type. Also move
the eviction code to make things a little simpler.

* Refactor to have a single `remove` method

Centralize the code that handles the removal of a transaction to avoid
mistakes.

* Move mempool size limiting back to `Storage`

Because the evicted transactions must be added to the rejected list.

* Remove leftover `dbg!` statement

Leftover from some temporary testing code.

Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>

* Remove unnecessary `TODO`

It is more speculation than planning, so it doesn't add much value.

Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>

* Fix typo in documentation

The verb should match the subject "transactions" which is plural.

Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>

* Add a comment to warn about correctness

There's a subtle but important detail in the implementation that should
be made more visible to avoid mistakes in the future.

Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>

* Remove outdated comment

Left-over from the attempt to move the eviction into the `VerifiedSet`.

* Improve comment explaining lint removal

Rewrite the comment explaining why the Clippy lint was ignored.

* Check for spend conflicts in `VerifiedSet`

Refactor to avoid API misuse.

* Test rejected transaction rollback

Using two transactions, perform the same test adding a conflict to both
of them to check if the second inserted transaction is properly
rejected. Then remove any conflicts from the second transaction and add
it again. That should work, because if it doesn't it means that when the
second transaction was rejected it left things it shouldn't in the
cache.

* Test removal of multiple transactions

When removing multiple transactions from the mempool storage, all of the
ones requested should be removed and any other transaction should be
still be there afterwards.

* Increase mempool size to 4, so that spend conflict tests work

If the mempool size is smaller than 4,
these tests don't fail on a trivial removal bug.
Because we need a minimum number of transactions in the mempool
to trigger the bug.

Also commit a proptest seed that fails on a trivial removal bug.
(This seed fails if we remove indexes in order,
because every index past the first removes the wrong transaction.)

* Summarise transaction data in proptest error output

* Summarise spend conflict field data in proptest error output

* Summarise multiple removal field data in proptest error output

And replace the very large proptest debug output with the new summary.

Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
2021-10-10 23:54:46 +00:00
teor 664d4384d4
Un-reject mempool transactions if the rejection depends on the current tip (#2844)
* Split mempool storage errors into tip-based and chain-based

* Expire tip rejections every time we get a new block

FailedVerification and SpendConflict rejections only apply to the current tip.
The next tip can provide missing inputs, or evict conflicting transactions.

* Enforce MAX_EVICTION_MEMORY_ENTRIES for mempool reject lists
2021-10-07 16:58:42 -03:00
teor b6a60c6c17 Fix names that are exact or effects depending on the list 2021-10-07 13:43:53 -04:00
teor e470ed00e6 Return rejected transaction ID iterators from mempool storage
Also rename methods for consistency.
2021-10-07 13:43:53 -04:00
teor 964c819c80
Split storage errors into same effects and exact matches (#2833)
Co-authored-by: Conrado Gouvea <conrado@zfnd.org>
2021-10-07 15:04:23 +00:00
teor a3a4773047
Remove unused mempool errors (#2831)
* Remove unused mempool storage errors

Preparation for ticket #2819.

Removing these errors means that we don't have to decide
which type of transaction ID match we want for them.

* Remove unused mempool errors, and deduplicate storage errors

* rustfmt
2021-10-07 11:20:38 +10:00
Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho a0d45c38f3
Reject conflicting mempool transactions (#2765)
* Add `Transaction::spent_outpoints` getter method

Returns an iterator over the UTXO `OutPoint`s spent by the transaction.

* Add `mempool::Error::Conflict` variant

An error representing that a transaction was rejected because it
conflicts with another transaction that's already in the mempool.

* Reject conflicting mempool transactions

Reject including a transaction in the mempool if it spends outputs
already spent by, or reveals nullifiers already revealed by another
transaction in the mempool.

* Fix typo in documentation

Remove the `r` that was incorrectly added.

Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>

* Specify that the conflict is a spend conflict

Make the situation clearer, because there are other types of conflict.

Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>

* Clarify that the outpoints are from inputs

Because otherwise it could lead to confusion because it could also mean
the outputs of the transaction represented as `OutPoint` references.

Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>

* Create `storage::tests::vectors` module

Refactor to follow the convention used for other tests.

* Add an `AtLeastOne::first_mut` method

A getter to allow changing the first element.

* Add an `AtLeastOne::push` method

Allow appending elements to the collection.

* Derive `Arbitrary` for `FieldNotPresent`

This is just to make the code that generates arbitrary anchors a bit
simpler.

* Test if conflicting transactions are rejected

Generate two transactions (either V4 or V5) and insert a conflicting
spend, which can be either a transparent UTXO, or a nullifier for one of
the shielded pools. Check that any attempt to insert both transactions
causes one to be accepted and the other to be rejected.

* Delete a TODO comment that we decided not to do

Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
2021-09-28 01:03:08 +00:00