* start refactoring transaction v4 for transaction v5
- move ShieldedData to sapling
- add AnchorVariant
- rename shielded_data to sapling_shielded data in V4
- move value_balance into ShieldedData
- update prop tests for new structure
* add AnchorVariant to Spend
- make anchor types available from sapling crate
- update serialize
* change shielded_balances_match() arguments
* change variable name anchor to shared_anchor in ShieldedData
* fix empty value balance serialization
* use AnchorV in shielded spends
* Rename anchor to per_spend_anchor
* Use nullifiers function directly in non-finalized state
* Use self.value_balance instead of passing it as an argument
* Add missing fields to ShieldedData PartialEq
* Derive Copy for tag types
* Add doc comments for ShieldedData refactor
* Implement a per-spend anchor compatibility iterator
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* export proptest impls for use in downstream crates
* add testjob for disabled feature in zebra-chain
* run rustfmt
* try to fix github actions syntax
* differentiate name
* prove that github action tests zebra-chain build without features
* revert change from last commit now that test is running
* remove accidentally introduced newline
* Update .github/workflows/ci.yml
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
The ShieldedData container for the spend and output descriptions of a
transaction does *not* move, because it's encoding transaction
structure. A good sign that this is the right factoring is that the
transaction module now only needs to pull in sapling::{Spend, Output}
and not all the internals.
Alfredo Garcia
Jane Lusby
Henry de Valence