* add transaction V5 stub
* add v5_strategy
* deduplicate version group ids
* Update comment for V5 transactions
* Add V5 transactions to non_finalized_state
Currently these are all `unimplemented!(...)`
* Fix struct matches
* Apply trivial panic message changes
* add zcash_deserialize for V5
* make all tx versions explicit in sprout and sapling nullifier functions
* match exhaustively in sprout and sapling nullifier functions
* fix matches in zebra-consensus
* fix NU5 strategy
* We're still deciding if v5 transactions support Sprout
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
## Motivation
This PR is motivated by the regression identified in https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/issues/1349. That PR notes that the metrics stopped working for most of the crates other than `zebrad`.
## Solution
This PR resolves the regression by deduplicating the `metrics` crate dependency. During a recent change we upgraded the metrics version in `zebrad` and a couple other of our crates, but we never updated the dependencies in `zebra-state`, `zebra-consensus`, or `zebra-network`. This caused the metrics macros to attempt to retrieve the current metrics exporter through the wrong function. We would install the metrics exporter in `0.13`, but then attempt to look it up through the `0.12` crate, which contains a different instance of the metrics exporter static variable which is unset. Doing this causes the metrics macros to return `None` for the current exporter after which they just silently give up.
## Related Issues
closes https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/issues/1349
## Follow Up Work
I noticed we have quite a few duplicate dependencies in our tree. We might be able to save some compilation time by auditing those and deduplicating them as much as possible.
- https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/issues/1582
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
As a side effect of computing Merkle roots, we build a list of
transaction hashes. Instead of discarding these, add them to
PreparedBlock and FinalizedBlock so that they can be reused rather than
recomputed.
This commit adds Merkle root validation to:
1. the block verifier;
2. the checkpoint verifier.
In the first case, Bitcoin Merkle tree malleability has no effect,
because only a single Merkle tree in each malleablity set is valid (the
others have duplicate transactions).
In the second case, we need to check that the Merkle tree does not contain any
duplicate transactions.
Closes#1385Closes#906
* implement inbound `FindBlocks`
* Handle inbound peer FindHeaders requests
* handle request before having any chain tip
* Split `find_chain_hashes` into smaller functions
Add a `max_len` argument to support `FindHeaders` requests.
Rewrite the hash collection code to use heights, so we can handle the
`stop` hash and "no intersection" cases correctly.
* Split state height functions into "any chain" and "best chain"
* Rename the best chain block method to `best_block`
* Move fmt utilities to zebra_chain::fmt
* Summarise Debug for some Message variants
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: Jane Lusby <jlusby42@gmail.com>
Temporary fix so that Zebra's default logs support a typical workflow:
1. Developer or user runs Zebra with the default config
2. They send the logs to a terminal
3. When they see a bug, they copy-paste the last few log lines into a
bug report
This is the same change that was merged in #1373 and reverted in #1375.
We'll create a consistent logging design for Zebra in ticket #1381.
This commit changes the state system and database format to track the
provenance of UTXOs, in addition to the outputs themselves.
Specifically, it tracks the following additional metadata:
- the height at which the UTXO was created;
- whether or not the UTXO was created from a coinbase transaction or
not.
This metadata will allow us to:
- check the coinbase maturity consensus rule;
- check the coinbase inputs => no transparent outputs rule;
- implement lookup of transactions by utxo (using the height to find the
block and then scanning the block) for a future RPC mechanism.
Closes#1342
This provides useful and not too noisy output at INFO level. We do an
info-level message on every block commit instead of trying to do one
message every N blocks, because this is useful both for initial block
sync as well as continuous state updates on new blocks.
This change introduces two new types:
- `PreparedBlock`, representing a block which has undergone semantic
validation and has been prepared for contextual validation;
- `FinalizedBlock`, representing a block which is ready to be finalized
immediately;
and changes the `Request::CommitBlock`,`Request::CommitFinalizedBlock`
variants to use these types instead of their previous fields.
This change solves the problem of passing data between semantic
validation and contextual validation, and cleans up the state code by
allowing it to pass around a bundle of data. Previously, the state code
just passed around an `Arc<Block>`, which forced it to needlessly
recompute block hashes and other data, and was incompatible with the
already-known but not-yet-implemented data transfer requirements, namely
passing in the Sprout and Sapling anchors computed during contextual
validation.
This commit propagates the `PreparedBlock` and `FinalizedBlock` types
through the state code but only uses their data opportunistically, e.g.,
changing .hash() computations to use the precomputed hash. In the
future, these structures can be extended to pass data through the
verification pipeline for reuse as appropriate. For instance, these
changes allow the sprout and sapling anchors to be propagated through
the state.
The behavior of a request for a UTXO from a previous block depends on
whether that block has already been submitted to the state, or not:
* if it has, the state should be able to find it and answer immediately.
* if it has not, the state should see it in a later request.
However, the previous code only checked committed blocks, not queued
blocks, so if the block containing the UTXO had already arrived but had
not been committed, it would never be scanned.
This patch fixes the problem but is a bad solution, duplicating
computation between the block verifier and the state. A better fix
follows in the next commit.
Make tracing messages more concise by omitting information already
contained in a parent span and by shortening messages. This makes them
easier to read.
Alfredo Garcia
Jane Lusby
Henry de Valence
teor
Jane Lusby