* validate sapling v5 tx
* Make itertools dependency optional
We only need itertools when the `proptest-impl` feature is enabled.
* Check if V4 and V5 coinbase transactions contain PrevOut transparent inputs
This is a bugfix on V4 transaction validation. The PrevOut consensus
rule was not explicitly stated in the Zcash spec until April 2021.
(But it was implied by Bitcoin, and partially implemented by Zebra.)
Also do the shielded sapling input check for V5 transactions.
* Add spec and orchard TODOs to has_inputs_and_outputs
Also make the variable names match the spec.
* Sort transaction functions to match v5 data order
* Simplify transaction input and output checks
Move counts or iterators into `Transaction` methods, so we can remove
duplicate code, and make the consensus rule logic clearer.
* Update sapling_balances_match for Transaction v5
- Quote from the spec
- Explain why the function is redunant for v5
- Rename the function so it's clear that it is sapling-specific
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Redesign Sapling data model for V5 shared anchor and spends
The shared anchor is only present if there are any spends.
As part of this change, delete the manual PartialEq impl and its tests,
because we can derive PartialEq now.
* Stop creating a temporary Vec for the spend and output iterators
* Rename TransferData variants
Interactive rename using the following commands:
```sh
fastmod Spends SpendsAndMaybeOutputs
fastmod NoSpends JustOutputs
```
* Refactor out common sprout nullifier code
* Implement the AtLeastOne constrained vector type
This vector wrapper ensures that it always contains at least one element.
* Simplify Sapling TransferData using AtLeastOne
Also update the RFC to use AtLeastOne for Orchard.
* add sapling shielded data to transaction V5
* implement nullifiers
* test v5 in shielded_data_roundtrip
* Explicitly design serialization for Transaction V5
Implement serialization for V4 and V5 spends and outputs, to make sure
that the design works.
* Test serialization for v5 spends and outputs
Also add a few missing v4 tests.
* Delete a disabled proptest
* Make v5 transactions a top-level heading
And add a missing serialized type.
* Fix a comment typo
* v5 transaction RFC: split array serialization
Based on #2017
* RFC: explicitly describe serialized field order
And link to the spec
* RFC: add the shared anchor serialization rule test
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* start refactoring transaction v4 for transaction v5
- move ShieldedData to sapling
- add AnchorVariant
- rename shielded_data to sapling_shielded data in V4
- move value_balance into ShieldedData
- update prop tests for new structure
* add AnchorVariant to Spend
- make anchor types available from sapling crate
- update serialize
* change shielded_balances_match() arguments
* change variable name anchor to shared_anchor in ShieldedData
* fix empty value balance serialization
* use AnchorV in shielded spends
* Rename anchor to per_spend_anchor
* Use nullifiers function directly in non-finalized state
* Use self.value_balance instead of passing it as an argument
* Add missing fields to ShieldedData PartialEq
* Derive Copy for tag types
* Add doc comments for ShieldedData refactor
* Implement a per-spend anchor compatibility iterator
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* add transaction V5 stub
* add v5_strategy
* deduplicate version group ids
* Update comment for V5 transactions
* Add V5 transactions to non_finalized_state
Currently these are all `unimplemented!(...)`
* Fix struct matches
* Apply trivial panic message changes
* add zcash_deserialize for V5
* make all tx versions explicit in sprout and sapling nullifier functions
* match exhaustively in sprout and sapling nullifier functions
* fix matches in zebra-consensus
* fix NU5 strategy
* We're still deciding if v5 transactions support Sprout
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Begin work on RFC5 implementation
* I think this is necessary
* holy shit supertrait implemented via subtrait
* implement most of the chain functions
* change to slightly better name
* implement fork
* fix outpoint handling in Chain struct
* update expect for work
* resolve review comment
* split utxo into two sets
* update the Chain definition
* just a little more
* update comment
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* apply changes from code review
* remove allow attribute in zebra-state/lib.rs
* Update zebra-state/src/memory_state.rs
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* merge ChainSet type into MemoryState
* rename state impl types
* Add error messages to asserts
* add module doc comment
* update RFC for utxos
* add missing header
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* export proptest impls for use in downstream crates
* add testjob for disabled feature in zebra-chain
* run rustfmt
* try to fix github actions syntax
* differentiate name
* prove that github action tests zebra-chain build without features
* revert change from last commit now that test is running
* remove accidentally introduced newline
* Update .github/workflows/ci.yml
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
* Implement sighash
* move sighash logic to a separate module
* start filling in more of the alg
* start setting up a test case
* make the test useful
* Iter transaction inputs
* better error message for expect
* add support for zip243 sighash
* ohey first testvector is passing, yayyy
* pass the second testvector
* add last testvector
* move a use statement
* use common deserialization code for amount everywhere
* cleanup attributes
* bring in fixed preimage
* fix discrepancy with spec
* always deserialize as a signed value
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction/sighash.rs
* update unreachable statements
* add serialization impls for nonnegative amounts
* Apply suggestions from code review
* document sighash fn
* tweek docs
* fix mistake in translation for zip243
* consistent error messages
* reorder because i like it more that way
* document more panics
* Update zebra-chain/src/amount.rs
* Add comment regarding the serialization of spend descriptions in sighash
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
The ShieldedData container for the spend and output descriptions of a
transaction does *not* move, because it's encoding transaction
structure. A good sign that this is the right factoring is that the
transaction module now only needs to pull in sapling::{Spend, Output}
and not all the internals.
* chain: add Transaction::is_coinbase()
This matches the check in zcashd/src/primitives/transaction.h:682
(CTransaction::IsCoinBase).
* chain: correct Block::is_coinbase_first
This matches zcashd/src/main.cpp:3968-3974 in CheckBlock.
Previously, the check allowed the first transaction to have multiple coinbase inputs.
* chain: return slices from Transaction::inputs()/outputs()
They're slices internally so we might as well just expose them that way.
The CoinbaseData field can only be constructed by the transaction parser, so we
can ensure that a coinbase input is always serializable, as CoinbaseData
instances can't be constructed outside of the parser that maintains the data
size invariant.
Because we represent each transaction version as a different variant of the
Transaction enum, we end up in a situation where fields that are common to
different transaction versions are awkward to access, requiring a match
statement with identical match arms.
To fix this, this commit adds the following convenience methods:
* `Transaction::inputs() -> impl Iterator<Item=&TransparentInput>`;
* `Transaction::outputs() -> impl Iterator<Item=&TransparentOutput>`;
* `Transaction::lock_time() -> LockTime`;
* `Transaction::expiry_height() -> Option<ExpiryHeight>`;
The last returns an `Option` because the field is only present in V3 and V4
transactions.
There are some remaining fields that do not get common accessors, because it
probably doesn't make sense to access independently of knowing the transaction
version: `joinsplit_data`, `shielded_data`, `value_balance`.
In the previous transaction modeling I defined the structs so that the number
of old and new commitments for a JoinSplit were variable, when in fact the
Sprout design fixes both to be 2. So now they are hardcoded as 2 in the source
code as well. This commit also fixes some missing `pub` fields on the
`JoinSplit` struct.
* Added a few more top-level fields for the Transaction struct
* Add a placeholder Script type.
This could alternately use bytes::Bytes to save some allocations
but I don't think this is important to get perfectly now. In the future, we
will want to have all of the script handling code in the zebra-script crate,
but we will need to have a container type for an encoded script in zebra-chain,
because otherwise zebra-chain would depend on zebra-script and not the other
way around.
* Rename Transaction{Input,Output} -> Transparent{Input,Output}.
These are only *transparent* inputs and outputs, so by putting Transparent in
the name (instead of Transaction) it's more clear that a transaction's inputs
or outputs can also be shielded.
* Add a LockTime enum.
* First attempt at a Transaction enum.
This attempts to map the versioning and field presence rules into an ADT, so
that structurally invalid transactions (e.g., a BCTV14 proof in a Sapling
transaction) are unrepresentable.
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction.rs
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
* Add fixme note on type refinement.
* Rename Transaction variants according to version.
* Split transaction.rs into submodules.
* Start filling in spend, output descriptions.
* Progress on JoinSplit data structures.
This has a lot of duplication and should really use generics to abstract over
Sprout-on-BCTV14 or Sprout-on-Groth16.
* Add data types for Bctv14 and Groth16 proofs.
This also adds a trait to abstract over them.
* Make JoinSplit descriptions generic over the proof system.
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction/joinsplit.rs
Alfredo Garcia
teor
Jane Lusby
Deirdre Connolly
Jane Lusby
Henry de Valence