* Fix the syntax of links in comments
* Fix a mistake in the docs
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* Remove unnecessary angle brackets from a link
* Revert the changes for links that serve as references
* Revert "Revert the changes for links that serve as references"
This reverts commit 8b091aa9fab453e7d3559a5d474e0879183b9bfb.
* Remove `<` `>` from links that serve as references
This reverts commit 046ef25620ae1a2140760ae7ea379deecb4b583c.
* Don't use `<` `>` in normal comments
* Don't use `<` `>` for normal comments
* Revert changes for comments starting with `//`
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* Derive Hash for transparent address index types
* Expose some types used by transparent address indexes
* Add an empty transparent transfers type for transparent address indexes
* Update TransparentTransfers with created UTXOs
* Add spent transparent outputs to ContextuallyValidBlock
* Update TransparentTransfers with spent transparent outputs
* Ignore missing spent outputs, so that tests pass
* Remove empty TransparentTransfers after a spend revert
* Update TransparentTransfers with creating and spending transaction IDs
* Ignore duplicate created UTXOs, so that tests pass
* Add some TODO comments
* Remove accidental doctest formatting
* Add address transfers index accessor methods
* Use TransactionLocation in the non-finalized state
* Apply more address index assertions to production code
* Refactor deeply nested code and apply more assertions
* Return UTXOs in chain order
* Return transaction hashes in chain order
* Stop indexing each transparent output multiple times
* Run some more asserts during tests
* Tidy TODO comments
* Fix an incorrect assert condition
* Use OrderedUtxos so that spent UTXOs can be stored in chain order
* Update tests to use OrderedUtxos
* Update the index API for the getaddressutxos query
* Remove redundant arguments in tests
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Support large block heights
* Document consensus rules referring to expiry heights
* Refactor the docs
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Fix the formatting of an error message
* refactor: Simplify coinbase expiry code so the consensus rule is clear (#3408)
* Fix some outdated TODO comments
* refactor(coinbase expiry): Simplify the code so consensus rule is clear
* Fix the formatting of an error message
* Remove a redundant comment
Co-authored-by: Marek <mail@marek.onl>
Co-authored-by: Marek <mail@marek.onl>
* Check the max expiry height at parse time
* Test that 2^31 - 1 is the last valid height
* Add tests for nExpiryHeight
* Add tests for expiry heights of V4 transactions
* Add tests for V5 transactions
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Make Amount arithmetic more generic
To modify generated amounts, we need some extra operations on `Amount`.
We also need to extend existing operations to both `NonNegative` and
`NegativeAllowed` amounts.
* Add a constrain method for ValueBalance
* Derive Eq for ValueBalance
* impl Neg for ValueBalance
* Make some Amount arithmetic expectations explicit
* Explain why we use i128 for multiplication
And expand the overflow error details.
* Expand Amount::sum error details
* Make amount::Error field order consistent
* Rename an amount::Error variant to Constraint, so it's clearer
* Add specific pool variants to ValueBalanceError
* Update coinbase remaining value consensus rule comment
This consensus rule was updated recently to include coinbase transactions,
but Zebra doesn't check block subsidy or miner fees yet.
* Add test methods for modifying transparent values and shielded value balances
* Temporarily set values and value balances to zero in proptests
In both generated chains and proptests that construct their own transactions.
Using zero values reduces value calculation and value check test coverage.
A future change will use non-zero values, and fix them so the check passes.
* Add extra fields to remaining transaction value errors
* Swap the transparent value balance sign to match shielded value balances
This makes the signs of all the chain value pools consistent.
* Use a NonNegative constraint for transparent values
This fix:
* makes the type signature match the consensus rules
* avoids having to write code to handle negative values
* Allocate total generated transaction input value to outputs
If there isn't enough input value for an output, set it to zero.
Temporarily reduce all generated values to avoid overflow.
(We'll remove this workaround when we calculate chain value balances.)
* Consistently use ValueBalanceError for ValueBalances
* Make the value balance signs match the spec
And rename and document methods so their signs are clearer.
* Convert amount::Errors to specific pool ValueBalanceErrors
* Move some error changes to the next PR
* Add extra info to remaining transaction value errors (#2585)
* Distinguish between overflow and negative remaining transaction value errors
And make some error types cloneable.
* Add methods for updating chain value pools (#2586)
* Move amount::test to amount::tests:vectors
* Make ValueBalance traits more consistent with Amount
- implement Add and Sub variants with Result and Assign
- derive Hash
* Clarify some comments and expects
* Create ValueBalance update methods for blocks and transactions
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* Validate transparent coinbase output maturity and shielding
- Add a CoinbaseSpendRestriction enum and Transaction method
- Validate transparent coinbase spends in non-finalized chains
* Don't use genesis created UTXOs for spends in generated block chains
* Refactor out a new_transaction_ordered_outputs function
* Add Transaction::outputs_mut for tests
* Generate valid transparent spends in arbitrary block chains
* When generating blocks, fixup the block contents, then the block hash
* Test that generated chains contain at least one transparent spend
* Make generated chains long enough for reliable tests
* Add transparent and shielded input and output methods to Transaction
* Split chain generation into 3 functions
* Test that unshielded and immature transparent coinbase spends fail
* Comment punctuation
* Clarify a comment
* Clarify probability calculation
* Test that shielded mature coinbase output spends succeed
* add value_balance methods to transparent and shielded
* add value_balance() to transaction
* check the remaining value consensus rule
* change error name
* fix doc and nitpick
* refactor value_balance() method for joinsplit
* changes to value_balance() of Inputs
* implement joinsplits() method(not working)
* remove created methods
* remove special case
* change return error in utilities
* move utils functions to transaction methods
* fix the docs
* simplify some code
* add constrains explicitly
* remove turbofish
* refactor some transaction methods
* fix value balance signs, add docs
* simplify some code
* avoid panic in consensus check
* add missing doc
* move remaining value balance check to the state
* make changes from the last review
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Reject transparent output double-spends
Check that transparent spends use unspent outputs from:
* earlier transaction in the same block,
* earlier blocks in the parent non-finalized chain, or
* the finalized state.
* Fixup UTXOs in proptests
* Add a comment
* Clarify a consensus rule implementation
* Fix an incorrect comment
* Fix an incorrect error message
* Clarify a comment
* Document `unspent_utxos`
* Simplify the UTXO check
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
* Further simplify and fix the UTXO check
- split each error case into a separate check
- combine `contains` and `insert`
- add a missing check against the non-finalized unspent UTXOs
- rename arguments and edit error strings for clarity
* Share test methods between check test modules
* Make some chain fields available to tests
* Make error field names consistent with transparent::Input
* WIP: Add tests for UTXO double-spends
- accept output and spend in the same block
- accept output and spend in a later block
- reject output and double-spend all in the same block
- reject output then double-spend in a later block
- reject output, spend, then double-spend all in different blocks
* Use Extend rather than multiple pushes
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
* Use Extend for more pushes
* Limit the number of proptest cases, to speed up tests
* Test rejection of UTXOs that were never in the chain
* Test rejection of spends of later transactions in the same block
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
Marek
Conrado Gouvea
teor
Alfredo Garcia