* Rename internal network requests for wide transaction IDs
fastmod TransactionsByHash TransactionsById zebra*
fastmod AdvertiseTransactions AdvertiseTransactionIds zebra*
fastmod MempoolTransactions MempoolTransactionIds zebra*
fastmod TransactionHashes TransactionIds zebra*
* Update network transaction request/response comments
* Rename a transaction hash method for wide transaction IDs
fastmod transaction_hashes transaction_ids zebra-network
* Add UnminedTxId methods and conversions for InventoryHash
* Map WtxIds to unmined transaction network messages
Also, use UnminedTxId and UnminedTx in:
* Zebra's internal request and response format, and
* external Zcash network protocol messages.
* Enable WtxId mempool inventory tracking for peers
* Further clarify transaction IDs
* Use Witnessed rather than Wide for transaction IDs
And rename narrow to legacy when it only applies to v1-v4 transactions.
Otherwise, rename it to mined ID.
* Rename a missed binding
* Remove an incorrectly named binding
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
We modeled a Bitcoin `headers` message as being a list of block headers.
However, the actual data structure is slightly different: it's a list of (block
header, transaction count) pairs. This caused zcashd to reject our headers
messages.
To fix this, introduce a new `CountedHeader` struct with a `block::Header` and
transaction count `usize`, then thread it through the inbound service and the
state.
I tested this locally by running Zebra with these changes and inspecting a
trace-level log of the span of a peer connection that requested a nontrivial
headers packet from us, and verified that it did not reject our message.
This commit makes several related changes to the network code:
- adds a `TransactionsByHash(HashSet<transaction::Hash>)` request and
`Transactions(Vec<Arc<Transaction>>)` response pair that allows
fetching transactions from a remote peer;
- adds a `PushTransaction(Arc<Transaction>)` request that pushes an
unsolicited transaction to a remote peer;
- adds an `AdvertiseTransactions(HashSet<transaction::Hash>)` request
that advertises transactions by hash to a remote peer;
- adds an `AdvertiseBlock(block::Hash)` request that advertises a block
by hash to a remote peer;
Then, it modifies the connection state machine so that outbound
requests to remote peers are handled properly:
- `TransactionsByHash` generates a `getdata` message and collects the
results, like the existing `BlocksByHash` request.
- `PushTransaction` generates a `tx` message, and returns `Nil` immediately.
- `AdvertiseTransactions` and `AdvertiseBlock` generate an `inv`
message, and return `Nil` immediately.
Next, it modifies the connection state machine so that messages
from remote peers generate requests to the inbound service:
- `getdata` messages generate `BlocksByHash` or `TransactionsByHash`
requests, depending on the content of the message;
- `tx` messages generate `PushTransaction` requests;
- `inv` messages generate `AdvertiseBlock` or `AdvertiseTransactions`
requests.
Finally, it refactors the request routing logic for the peer set to
handle advertisement messages, providing three routing methods:
- `route_p2c`, which uses p2c as normal (default);
- `route_inv`, which uses the inventory registry and falls back to p2c
(used for `BlocksByHash` or `TransactionsByHash`);
- `route_all`, which broadcasts a request to all ready peers (used for
`AdvertiseBlock` and `AdvertiseTransactions`).
This is the first in a sequence of changes that change the block:: items
to not include Block as a prefix in their name, in accordance with the
Rust API guidelines.
Bitcoin does this either with `getblocks` (returns up to 500 following block
hashes) or `getheaders` (returns up to 2000 following block headers, not
just hashes). However, Bitcoin headers are much smaller than Zcash
headers, which contain a giant Equihash solution block, and many Zcash
blocks don't have many transactions in them, so the block header is
often similarly sized to the block itself. Because we're
aiming to have a highly parallel network layer, it seems better to use
`getblocks` to implement `FindBlocks` (which is necessarily sequential)
and parallelize the processing of the block downloads.
PushPeers is more complicated to thread into the rest of our
architecture (we would need to establish a data path connecting our
service handling inbound requests to the network layer's auto-crawler),
and since we crawl the network automatically anyways, we don't actually
need to accept them in order to get updated address information.
The only possible problem with this approach is that zcashd refuses to
answer multiple address requests from the same connection, ostensibly
for fingerprinting prevention (although it's totally happy to give
exactly the same information, as long as you hang up and reconnect
first, lol). It's unclear how this will interact with our design -- on
the one hand, it could mean that we don't get new addr information when
we ask, but on the other hand, we may have enough churn in our
connection pool that this isn't a problem anyways.
Attempting to implement requests for block data revealed a problem with
the previous connection logic. Block data is requested by sending a
`getdata` message with hashes of the requested blocks; the peer responds
with a sequence of `block` messages with the blocks themselves.
However, this wasn't possible to handle with the previous connection
logic, which could only convert a single Bitcoin message into a
Response. Instead, we factor out the message handling logic into a
Handler, which can statefully accumulate arbitrary data into a Response
and signal completion. This is still pretty ugly but it does work.
As a side effect, the HeartbeatNonceMismatch error is removed; because
the Handler now tries to process messages until it comes to a Response,
it just ignores mismatched nonces (and will eventually time out).
The previous Mempool and Transaction requests were removed but could be
re-added in a different form later. Also, the `Get` prefixes are
removed from `Request` to tidy the name.