This fixes a bug introduced when we added heartbeat support. Recall that we
handle the Bitcoin connection state machine on a per-peer basis. Each
connection has a task created from the `Connection` struct, and a `Client:
tower::Service` "frontend" that passes requests to it via a channel. In the
`Connection` event loop, the connection checks whether the request channel has
been closed, indicating no further requests from the `Client`, in which case it
shuts itself down and cleans up resources. This occurs when all of the senders
have been dropped.
However, this behavior broke when we introduced heartbeat support, because we
spawned an additional task to send heartbeat messages along the request
channel. This meant that instead of having a single sender, dropped by the
`Client`, we have two senders, the `Client` and the "shadow client" task that
generates heartbeat messages. This means that when the `Client` is dropped, we
still have a live sender and the connection is not closed. To fix this, the
`Client` now uses a `oneshot` to shut down its corresponding heartbeat task.
This closes all senders.
- Add a total peers metric to prevent races between measurements of
ready/unready peers (which can cause the sum to be wrong).
- Add an outbound request counter.
Previously, we relied on the owner of the handshake future to drive it to
completion. This meant that there were cases where handshakes might never be
completed, just because nothing was actively polling them.
The previous outbound peer connection logic got requests to connect to new
peers and processed them one at a time, making single connection attempts
and retrying if the connection attempt failed. This was quite slow, because
many connections fail, and we have to wait for timeouts. Instead, this logic
connects to new peers concurrently (up to 50 at a time).
This means that all sub-modules of `peer` can import everything they need from
the `peer` module itself, without having to be aware of the internal structure
of their sibling modules.
It's only responsible for doing the handshakes, so it should be named that way,
and then we can have a Connector responsible for actually opening the TCP
connection.