* update librustzcash; adapt to new API
* add ticket reference for removing zcash_proofs duplicated dependencies
* update to new zcash_script V5 API
* use zp_tx shorthand
* update to Zcash 4.7.0 dependencies
* update protocol versions
* feat(rpc): Implement `getblockchaininfo` RPC method (#3891)
* Implement `getblockchaininfo` RPC method
* add a test for `get_blockchain_info`
* fix tohex/fromhex
* move comment
* Update lightwalletd acceptance test for getblockchaininfo RPC (#3914)
* change(rpc): Return getblockchaininfo network upgrades in height order (#3915)
* Update lightwalletd acceptance test for getblockchaininfo RPC
* Update some doc comments for network upgrades
* List network upgrades in order in the getblockchaininfo RPC
Also:
- Use a constant for the "missing consensus branch ID" RPC value
- Simplify fetching consensus branch IDs
- Make RPC type derives consistent
- Update RPC type documentation
* Make RPC type derives consistent
* Fix a confusing test comment
* get hashand height at the same time
* fix estimated_height
* fix lint
* add extra check
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
* fix typo
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
* split test
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
* fix(rpc): ignore an expected error in the RPC acceptance tests (#3961)
* Add ignored regexes to test command failure regex methods
* Ignore empty chain error in getblockchaininfo
We expect this error when zebrad starts up with an empty state.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Make sync error logs more user-friendly (#3944)
- use info level, there is nothing the user needs to do,
particularly for a single error
- explain that the errors are temporary
- hide backtraces, because they look like crashes
* Update test.patch.yml with lightwalletd job (#3970)
* Update test.patch.yml with lightwalletd job
* Remove a workflow condition that will always be false
In general, patch workflows need the
opposite conditions to the original workflow.
But in this case, we know the result of the
condition will always be true, so we can just delete it.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* fix(doc): Fix bugs in the lightwalletd database design (#3964)
* Re-order column families in design in dependency order
* Minor RFC design tweaks and fixes
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Repoint zebra image links to our new zfnd.org site for now (#3949)
* Repoint zebra image links to our new zfnd.org site for now
* Remove images/
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix typos (#3956)
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* bump database version to trigger testnet rollback
* reduce minimum protocol version for now (will be changed later)
* update dependencies
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* update versions to match zcash 4.7.0
* deny.toml: update 'darling'
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dimitris Apostolou <dimitris.apostolou@icloud.com>
* Add Utxo constructors from output locations
* Store transparent outputs rather than Utxo structs
* Update raw data snapshots
* Increment the state version
* Support large block heights
* Document consensus rules referring to expiry heights
* Refactor the docs
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Fix the formatting of an error message
* refactor: Simplify coinbase expiry code so the consensus rule is clear (#3408)
* Fix some outdated TODO comments
* refactor(coinbase expiry): Simplify the code so consensus rule is clear
* Fix the formatting of an error message
* Remove a redundant comment
Co-authored-by: Marek <mail@marek.onl>
Co-authored-by: Marek <mail@marek.onl>
* Check the max expiry height at parse time
* Test that 2^31 - 1 is the last valid height
* Add tests for nExpiryHeight
* Add tests for expiry heights of V4 transactions
* Add tests for V5 transactions
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(network): send notfound messages to the inventory registry
* refactor(network): move the inventory filter into an async function
* feat(network): avoid routing requests to peers that are missing inventory
* test(network): advertised routing is independent of numeric address value
* test(network): peer set routes requests to peers not missing that inventory
* test(network): peer set fails requests if all ready peers are missing that inventory
* fix(clippy): needless-borrow in the peer set
* fix(lint): remove redundant trailing commas in macro calls
There is no clippy lint for this, maybe because some macros
are sensitive to trailing commas.
(But not the ones changed in this commit.)
* test(network): check the exact number of inventory peers
* doc(network): explain why we ignore inventory send failures
* docs(network): explain why a channel error is ignored
* Add all_previous_outputs; load UTXOs in transaction verifier
* Remove UTXO loading and returning from script.rs
* Don't pass state service to script verifier
* Remove output from is_valid()
* Refactor loading UTXOs to separate function
* Pass all_previous_output to sighash
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Create AwaitUtxo only when needed; formatting
* Add comments about output vectors in tests
* Change sighash() to receive reference and avoid cloning
* Expand comments
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Ensure that sapling::keys::TransmissionKey jubjub point is always in the prime order group
* Adjust TransmissionKey check; add AuthorizingKey check
* Move ValueCommitment small order check to deserialization
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
* Use is_torsion_free() instead of is_identity() and is_prime_order()
* Add EphemeralPublicKey small order check on instantiation; remove old checks
* Use VerificationKey instead of VerificationKeyBytes; fix tests
* Use ValidatingKey instead of VerificationKeyBytes for rk
* Reject identity when creating an Orchard EphemeralPublicKey
* Make documentation more consistent, use generator in tests
* s/JubJub/Jubjub/
* Fix zebra-consensus tests (insert_fake_orchard_shielded_data)
* Create NotSmallOrderValueCommitment, since intermediate values can be the identity
* Clarify documentation
* rustdoc
* Tidy rustdoc
Co-authored-by: Conrado Gouvea <conrado@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: Pili Guerra <mpguerra@users.noreply.github.com>
* Create a strategy for block heights after Sapling
Provides an arbitrary network (mainnet or testnet) and a block height
between the Sapling activation height on that network and the maximum
block height.
* Create a helper function to select block heights
Allows generating block heights inside a range using a scale factor
between 0 and 1.
* Allow specifying the outpoint index for mock UTXOs
Avoid creating multiple transparent transfers in the same transaction
with the same source UTXO, which would lead to a double spend.
* Create helper function to mock multiple transfers
Given relative block height scale factors, create a mock transparent
transfer for each one of them.
Also add a constant that serves as a guideline for the maximum number of
transparent transfers to mock.
* Create helper function to sanitize tx. version
Make sure the arbitrary transaction version is valid for the network
(testnet or mainnet) at the specified block height.
* Create `mock_transparent_transaction` helper func.
Creates a V4 or V5 mock transaction that only includes transparent
inputs and outputs.
* Create helper function for transaction validation
Performs the actual tested action of verifying a transaction. It sets up
the verifier and uses it to obtain the verification result.
* Test if zero lock time means unlocked
Generate arbitrary transactions with zero lock time, and check that they
are accepted by the transaction verifier.
* Allow changing the sequence number of an input
Add a setter method for a `transparent::Input`'s sequence number. This
setter is only available for testing.
* Test if sequence numbers can disable lock time
Create arbitrary transactions and set the sequence numbers of all of its
inputs to `u32::MAX` to see if that disables the lock time and the
transactions are accepted by the verifier.
* Test block height lock times
Make sure that the transaction verifier rejects transactions that are
still locked at a certain block height.
* Test block time lock times
Test that the transaction verifier rejects a transaction that is
validated at a block time that's before the transaction's lock time.
* Test unlocking by block height
Test that transactions unlocked at an earlier block height are accepted
by the transaction verifier.
* Test transactions unlocked by the block time
Test that transactions that were unlocked at a previous block time are
accepted by the transaction verifier.
* Fix an incorrect method comment
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Integrate JoinSplit verifier with transaction verifier
* Add test with malformed Groth16 Output proof
* Use TryFrom instead of From in ItemWrapper to correctly propagate malformed proof errors
* Simplify by removing ItemWrapper and directly TryFrom into Item
* Fix existing tests to work with JoinSplit validation
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: Pili Guerra <mpguerra@users.noreply.github.com>
* validate non coinbase expiration height
* change var name
* move checks to transaction verifier
* Add variants and debug fields to transaction expiry errors
* Fix a failing existing test
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Create a `LockTime::unlocked` helper constructor
Returns a `LockTime` that is unlocked at the genesis block.
* Return `Option<LockTime>` from `lock_time` method
Prepare to return `None` for when a transaction has its lock time
disabled.
* Return `None` instead of zero `LockTime`
Because a zero lock time means that the transaction was unlocked at the
genesis block, so it was never actually locked.
* Rephrase zero lock time check comment
Clarify that the check is not redundant, and is necessary for the
genesis transaction.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Add a `transparent::Input::sequence` getter method
Retrieve a transparent input's sequence number.
* Check if lock time is enabled by a sequence number
Validate the consensus rule that the lock time is only enabled if at
least one transparent input has a value different from `u32::MAX` as its
sequence number.
* Add more Zcash specific details to comment
Explain the Zcash specific lock time behaviors.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Add `time` field to `Request::Block` variant
The block time to use to check if the transaction was unlocked and
allowed to be included in the block.
* Add `Request::block_time` getter
Returns the block time for the block that owns the transaction being
validated or the current time plus a tolerance for mempool transactions.
* Validate transaction lock times
If they are enabled by a transaction's transparent input sequence
numbers, make sure that they are in the past.
* Add comments with consensus rule parts
Make it easier to map what part of the consensus rule each match arm is
responsible for.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* First pass at async Halo2 verification service
Stubs out a batch verifier for the future.
The dependencies for orchard, halo2, librustzcash, zcash_primitives, have
not been resolved.
* Halo2 verifier service and test
* Remove redundant conversion
* Test async halo2 verifier service with pre-computed Orchard shielded data test vectors
* Fix typo
Co-authored-by: Conrado Gouvea <conrado@zfnd.org>
* Assert future result is_ok() in Halo2 verifier test
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
* Shorten tower::Service trait constraints for Halo2 verifier tests
* Remove commented out trait constraints
* .expect() vs .unwrap() to parse orchard::redpallas::VerificationKey
* Use .to_vec() for some test vectors
* Fix self-referential Display impl
* Fix deps
* Distinguish orchard vs zebra_chain::orchard imports
* Add test that halo2 verifier fails with malformed proof inputs
* Use thiserror for Halo2Error
* Use ZcashFoundation/orchard instead of dconnolly/orchard
* Add a link to the issue to remove the zfnd fork of orchard crate
* Update zebra-consensus/Cargo.toml
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Add note
* Move artificial Orchard shielded data test vectors to zebra-test
* Align brackets
* Tidy some trait constraints and debug statements
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Conrado Gouvea <conrado@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Reorder imports to follow convention
Place the imports from `std` at the top.
* Add transaction errors for double spends
Add a variant for each pool. They represent a double spend inside a
transaction.
* Add `check::spend_conflicts` implementation
Checks if a transaction has spend conflicts, i.e., if a transaction
spends a UTXO more than once or if it reveals a nullifier more than
once.
* Reject transactions with internal spend conflicts
The transaction verifier should reject transactions that spend the same
transparent UTXO or that reveal the same nullifier.
* Add transparent spend consensus rule
Add it to the documentation to help with understanding and auditing it.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Use different nullifiers by default
Don't use the same nullifier twice when mocking a
`sprout::JoinSplitData` because it will lead to an invalid transaction.
* Test transactions with repeated spend outpoints
Since that represents a spend conflict, they should be rejected.
* Test duplicate nullifiers in joinsplit
Check if a mock transaction with a joinsplit that reveals the same
nullifier twice is rejected.
* Test duplicate nullifiers across joinsplits
Check if a duplicate nullifier in two different joinsplits in the same
transaction is rejected.
* Test V4 transaction with duplicate Sapling spend
Check if a V4 transaction that has a duplicate Sapling spend is
rejected.
* Test V5 transaction with duplicate Sapling spend
Check if a V5 transaction that has a duplicate Sapling spend is
rejected.
* Test V5 transaction with duplicate Orchard actions
Check if a V5 transaction that has duplicate Orchard actions is rejected
by the transaction verifier.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Create a new VerifiedUnminedTx containing the miner fee
* Use VerifiedUnminedTx in mempool verification responses
And do a bunch of other cleanups.
* Use VerifiedUnminedTx in mempool download and verifier
* Use VerifiedUnminedTx in mempool storage and verified set
* Impl Display for VerifiedUnminedTx, and some convenience methods
* Use VerifiedUnminedTx in existing tests
* Get the transaction fee from utxos
* Return the transaction fee from the verifier
* Avoid calculating the fee for coinbase transactions
Coinbase transactions don't have fees. In case of a coinbase transaction, the
verifier returns a zero fee.
* Update the result obtained by `Downloads`
* Check return value of zcash_script_new_precomputed_tx
* Set the NU5 testnet activation height to 1_590_000
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Update Nu5 constants to new values
* Update ZIP-244 test vectors for new branch ID
* Squashed commit of the following:
commit bdb120a249e3e889a913114a712505defdade1d4
Author: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 5 11:54:01 2021 -0400
Use pallas::Base::from_str_vartime() in sinsemilla tests
commit e99fa4925857840fa65ccfb4a076ec412e416576
Author: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 5 11:45:24 2021 -0400
Compiles
commit a5200181146bfd2aa1e09abea2caaa7a7ceb006e
Author: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 5 10:15:17 2021 -0400
Incomplete upgrade of deps
* Squashed commit of the following:
commit 8d1b76ec5626517817c3a4d9f3950acc90a359df
Author: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 5 04:02:26 2021 +0000
Update `zcash_script` to support V5 transactions
Use a newer version of `zcash_script` that has been updated to support
V5 transactions.
commit 371233628ae61e0c25d6ba8f31d9dba42823becb
Author: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 5 03:06:20 2021 +0000
Update Zcash dependencies
Update some Zcash crates:
- `halo2`
- `incrementalmerkletree' (patch version)
- `orchard` (patch version)
- `zcash_history` (patch version)
- `zcash_note_encryption` (patch version)
- `zcash_primitives` (patch version)
And also update the `group` dependency so that the code remains
compatible.
commit de5cf1ec40c3fc08670fc971cdf3e65e13d9f4c7
Author: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 5 03:04:13 2021 +0000
Update error message assertion
Use the updated message for the expected error variant.
* Update `zcash_script` to support V5 transactions
Use a newer version of `zcash_script` that has been updated to support
V5 transactions.
Co-authored-by: Conrado Gouvea <conrado@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Add `Arc<Transaction>` conversions for Transaction IDs
* Use UnminedTxId as the transaction verifier response type
* Use UnminedTx in transaction verifier mempool requests
* Refactor is_mempool into a transaction verifier request method
* Order derives in alphabetical order
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
* Return a transaction verifier from `zebra_consensus::init`
This verifier is temporarily created separately from the block verifier's
transaction verifier.
* Return the same transaction verifier used by the block verifier
* Clarify that the mempool verifier is the transaction verifier
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: Conrado Gouvea <conrado@zfnd.org>
* Make Amount arithmetic more generic
To modify generated amounts, we need some extra operations on `Amount`.
We also need to extend existing operations to both `NonNegative` and
`NegativeAllowed` amounts.
* Add a constrain method for ValueBalance
* Derive Eq for ValueBalance
* impl Neg for ValueBalance
* Make some Amount arithmetic expectations explicit
* Explain why we use i128 for multiplication
And expand the overflow error details.
* Expand Amount::sum error details
* Make amount::Error field order consistent
* Rename an amount::Error variant to Constraint, so it's clearer
* Add specific pool variants to ValueBalanceError
* Update coinbase remaining value consensus rule comment
This consensus rule was updated recently to include coinbase transactions,
but Zebra doesn't check block subsidy or miner fees yet.
* Add test methods for modifying transparent values and shielded value balances
* Temporarily set values and value balances to zero in proptests
In both generated chains and proptests that construct their own transactions.
Using zero values reduces value calculation and value check test coverage.
A future change will use non-zero values, and fix them so the check passes.
* Add extra fields to remaining transaction value errors
* Swap the transparent value balance sign to match shielded value balances
This makes the signs of all the chain value pools consistent.
* Use a NonNegative constraint for transparent values
This fix:
* makes the type signature match the consensus rules
* avoids having to write code to handle negative values
* Allocate total generated transaction input value to outputs
If there isn't enough input value for an output, set it to zero.
Temporarily reduce all generated values to avoid overflow.
(We'll remove this workaround when we calculate chain value balances.)
* Consistently use ValueBalanceError for ValueBalances
* Make the value balance signs match the spec
And rename and document methods so their signs are clearer.
* Convert amount::Errors to specific pool ValueBalanceErrors
* Move some error changes to the next PR
* Add extra info to remaining transaction value errors (#2585)
* Distinguish between overflow and negative remaining transaction value errors
And make some error types cloneable.
* Add methods for updating chain value pools (#2586)
* Move amount::test to amount::tests:vectors
* Make ValueBalance traits more consistent with Amount
- implement Add and Sub variants with Result and Assign
- derive Hash
* Clarify some comments and expects
* Create ValueBalance update methods for blocks and transactions
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* Add an OrderedUtxo type for validation of spends within a block
This change allows us to check that transparent spends use outputs from
earlier in their block. (But we don't actually do that check yet.)
We need to keep the order of UTXOs when we're contextually verifying
each new block that is added to a chain. But the block order is
irrelevant for UTXOs stored in the state.
* Take ownership in utxos_from_ordered_utxos
* Delete a confusing comment
* Always use librustzcash for sighash and remove old sighash code
Also added ZIP-143 test vectors
* Remove librustzcash_sighash test that is no longer needed
* Make `verify_sapling_shielded_data` more generic
Prepare to support V5 transactions which have a shared anchor.
* Verify Sapling shielded data in V5 transactions
Call the `verify_sapling_shielded_data` method and add the respective
asynchronous checks to the set of V5 checks.
* Fix expect message in V4 transaction test
It was using the same message as the previous test, even though the test
searches with different criteria.
* Test V5 transaction with Sapling spends
Create a fake V5 transaction that has Sapling spends and check that the
verifier accepts the transaction.
* Ignore rejected V5 transaction test for now
Because now it needs the `sighash` implementation for V5 to be ready.
* Reference V5 `sighash` PR in comment
So that it is easier to check if it's possible to remove the
`should_panic` or not.
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* Remove `sapling shielded pool` TODO
V5 transactions now have Sapling shielded pool properly validated.
* Link to some extra issues in TODO comment
Some other issues are also necessary for full V5 validation.
* Add a TODO in the main code to fix the tests
Some tests are blocked due to missing features required for full V5
validation. Once those features are implemented, they should be updated
to remove the `#[should_panic]` attribute so that they actually run and
check the code correctly.
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* add disabled sprout pool check
* change method name
* change error name
* fix typo
* make the success test case in other tx than the coinbase
* use new `height` method instead of deriving `PartialOrd` in `NetworkUpgrade`
* move check of network upgrade into function, rename, docs
* increase test coverage
* fix comment
* Refactor to create `verify_sapling_shielded_data`
Move the code to verify Sapling shielded data into a new helper method
that returns `AsyncChecks`.
* Test verifying a Sapling transaction with spends
Use the test vectors to find a transaction that has Sapling spends and
test if it the verifier considers it valid.
* Create a helper method to list test transactions
Transforms the block test vectors into a list of transactions and block
heights for each transaction.
* Use new helper function in V4 Sapling spend test
Also use the block height for that transaction as specified in the test
vector.
* Test V4 tx. with Sapling outputs but no spends
Find a transaction V4 vector that has Sapling outputs but no spends, and
check that the verifier accepts it.
* Add a `zebra_test::RUNTIME` shared runtime
Create a lazily instantiated Tokio runtime that can be shared by tests.
* Split tests that require a shared runtime
Split two tests that were previously in one because of the need to share
a single Tokio runtime. With the `zebra_test::RUNTIME`, they can now
share the runtime without having to be a single test.
* Stop trying to verify coinbase inputs using the script verifier
And create tests to catch similar bugs earier.
* Use Testnet in NU5 tests that temporarily should_panic
We've marked these tests as should_panic until there is a NU5 activation
height. But Testnet will have an activation height first, so we should
prefer it in the tests. (Or use both networks.)
* Refactor to create `verify_sprout_shielded_data`
Move the join split verification code into a new
`verify_sprout_shielded_data` helper method that returns an
`AsyncChecks` set.
* Test if signed V4 tx. join splits are accepted
Create a fake V4 transaction with a dummy join split, and sign it
appropriately. Check if the transaction verifier accepts the
transaction.
* Test if unsigned V4 tx. joinsplit data is rejected
Create a fake V4 transaction with a dummy join split. Do NOT sign this
transaction's join split data, and check that the verifier rejects the
transaction.
* Join tests to share Tokio runtime
Otherwise one of the tests might fail incorrectly because of a
limitation in the test environment. `Batch` services spawn a task in the
Tokio runtime, but separate tests can have separate runtimes, so sharing
a `Batch` service can lead to the worker task only being available for
one of the tests.
* Add missing documentation
Document methods to describe what they do and why.
* Create an `AsyncChecks` type alias
Make it simpler to write the `FuturesUnordered` type with boxed futures.
This will also end up being used more when refactoring to return the
checks so that the `call` method can wait on them.
* Create `verify_transparent_inputs_and_outputs`
Refactors the verification of the transparent inputs and outputs into a
separate method.
* Refactor transparent checks to use `call_all`
Instead of pushing the verifications into a stream of unordered futures,
use the `ServiceExt::call_all` method to build an equivalent stream
after building a stream of requests.
* Replace `CallAll` with `FuturesUnordered`
Make it more consistent with the rest of the code, and make sure that
the `len()` method is available to use for tracing.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Refactor to move wait for checks into a new method
Allow the code snipped to be reused by other transaction
version-specific check methods.
* Verify transparent inputs in V5 transactions
Use the script verifier to check the transparent inputs in a V5
transaction.
* Check `has_inputs_and_outputs` for all versions
Check if a transaction has inputs and outputs, independently of the
transaction version.
* Wait for checks in `call` method
Refactor to move the repeated code into the `call` method. Now the
validation methods return the set of asynchronous checks to wait for.
* Add helper function to mock transparent transfers
Creates a fake source UTXO, and then the input and output that represent
spending that UTXO. The initial UTXO can be configured to have a script
that either accepts or rejects any spend attempt.
* Test if transparent V4 transaction is accepted
Create a fake V4 transaction that includes a fake transparent transfer
of funds. The transfer uses a script to allow any UTXO to spend it.
* Test transaction V4 rejection based on script
Create a fake transparent transfer where the source UTXO has a script
that rejects spending. The script verifier should not accept this
transaction.
* Test if transparent V5 transaction is accepted
Create a mock V5 transaction that includes a transparent transfer of
funds. The transaction should be accepted by the verifier.
* Test transaction V5 rejection based on script
Create a fake transparent transfer where the source UTXO has a script
that rejects spending. The script verifier should not accept this
transaction.
* Update `Request::upgrade` getter documentation
Simplify it so that it won't become updated when #1683 is fixed.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Add a `Transaction::version` getter
Returns the version of the transaction as a `u32`.
* Add `Transaction::is_overwintered` helper method
Returns if the `fOverwintered` flag should be set for the transaction's
version.
* Use new helpers to serialize transaction version
Reduce the repeated code and make it less error-prone with future
changes.
* Add getter methods to `transaction::Request` type
Refactor to move the type deconstruction code into the `Request` type.
The main objective is to make it easier to split the call handler into
methods that receive the request directly.
* Refactor to create `verify_v4_transaction` helper
Split the code specific to V4 transactions into a separate helper
method.
* Create `verify_v5_transaction` helper method
Prepare a separate method to have the validation code.
* Add `UnsupportedByNetworkUpgrade` error variant
An error for when a transaction's version isn't supported by the network
upgrade of the block it's included or for the current network upgrade if
the transaction is for the mempool.
* Verify a V5 transaction's network upgrade
For now, only NU5 supports V5 transactions.
* Test that V5 transaction is rejected on Canopy
Create a fake V5 transaction and try to verify it using a block height
from Canopy's activation. The verifier should reject the transaction
with an error saying that the network upgrade does not support that
transaction version.
* Test if V5 tx. is accepted after NU5 activation
Create a fake V5 transaction and pretend it is placed in a block that
has a height after the NU5 activation. The test should succeed, but
since the NU5 activation height has not been specified yet (neither for
the testnet nor the mainnet), for now this test is marked as
`should_panic`.
* Add `TODO` comment to the code
Add more detail to what's left to do, and link to the appropriate PRs.
* Use `u32` to store transaction version
Use a type consistent with how the version is specified.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Add a `at_least_one!` macro for testing
Similar to the `vec!` macro, but doesn't allow creating an empty list.
* Test if `has_inputs_and_outputs` considers actions
Create a dummy transaction with no inputs and no outputs, and add a
dummy Orchard action to it. The `check::has_inputs_and_outputs`
should succeed, because the consensus rule considers having Orchard
actions as having inputs and/or outputs.
* Refactor to create helper function
Move the code to create a fake Orchard shielded data instance to a
helper function in `zebra_chain::transaction::arbitrary`, so that other
tests can also use it.
* Test coinbase V5 transaction with enable spends
A V5 coinbase transaction that has Orchard shielded data MUST NOT have
the enable spends flag set.
* Test if coinbase without enable spends is valid
A coinbase transaction with Orchard shielded data and without the enable
spends flag set should be valid.
* Add a security comment about the `at_least_one!` macro
This macro must not be used outside tests, because it allows memory denial
of service.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Implement `PartialEq<i64>` for `Amount`
Allows to compare an `Amount` instance directly to an integer.
* Add `SerializationError::BadTransactionBalance`
Error variant representing deserialization of a transaction that doesn't
conform to the Sapling consensus rule where the balance MUST be zero if
there aren't any shielded spends and outputs.
* Validate consensus rule when deserializing
Return an error if the deserialized V4 transaction has a non-zero value
balance but doesn't have any Sapling shielded spends nor outputs.
* Add consensus rule link to field documentation
Describe how the consensus rule is validated structurally by
`ShieldedData`.
* Clarify that `value_balance` is zero
Make the description more concise and objective.
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* Update field documentation
Include information about how the consensus rule is guaranteed during
serialization.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Remove `check::sapling_balances_match` function
The check is redundant because the respective consensus rule is
validated structurally by `ShieldedData`.
* Test deserialization of invalid V4 transaction
A transaction with no Sapling shielded spends and no outputs but with a
non-zero balance value should fail to deserialize.
* Change least-significant byte of the value balance
State how the byte index is calculated, and change the least
significant-byte to be non-zero.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Fix documentation comment
Was missing a slash to become documentation.
* Add documentation link to type reference
Just to help navigation a bit.
* Implement `Transaction::orchard_actions()` getter
Returns an iterator to iterator over the actions in the Orchard shielded
data (if there is one, otherwise it returns an empty iterator).
* Add V5 support for `has_inputs_and_outputs`
Checks if the transaction has Orchard actions. If it does, it is
considered to have inputs and outputs.
* Refactor transaction test vectors
Make it easier to reuse the fake V5 transaction converter in other test
vectors.
* Move helper function to `zebra-chain` crate
Place it together with some other helper functions, including the one
that actually creates the fake V5 transaction.
* Test transaction with no inputs
`check::has_inputs_and_outputs` should return an error indicating that
the transaction has no inputs.
* Test transaction with no outputs
`check::has_inputs_and_outputs` should return an error indicating that
the transaction has no outputs.
* Note that transaction is fake in `expect` message
Should make the message easier to find, and also gives emphasis to the
fact that the transaction is a fake conversion to V5.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* validate sapling v5 tx
* Make itertools dependency optional
We only need itertools when the `proptest-impl` feature is enabled.
* Check if V4 and V5 coinbase transactions contain PrevOut transparent inputs
This is a bugfix on V4 transaction validation. The PrevOut consensus
rule was not explicitly stated in the Zcash spec until April 2021.
(But it was implied by Bitcoin, and partially implemented by Zebra.)
Also do the shielded sapling input check for V5 transactions.
* Add spec and orchard TODOs to has_inputs_and_outputs
Also make the variable names match the spec.
* Sort transaction functions to match v5 data order
* Simplify transaction input and output checks
Move counts or iterators into `Transaction` methods, so we can remove
duplicate code, and make the consensus rule logic clearer.
* Update sapling_balances_match for Transaction v5
- Quote from the spec
- Explain why the function is redunant for v5
- Rename the function so it's clear that it is sapling-specific
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Conrado Gouvea
teor
Marek
Deirdre Connolly
Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho
Alfredo Garcia