use std::collections::HashSet; use zebra_chain::block; use super::super::types::Nonce; /// A network request, represented in internal format. /// /// The network layer aims to abstract away the details of the Bitcoin wire /// protocol into a clear request/response API. Each [`Request`] documents the /// possible [`Response`s](super::Response) it can generate; it is fine (and /// recommended!) to match on the expected responses and treat the others as /// `unreachable!()`, since their return indicates a bug in the network code. #[derive(Clone, Debug)] pub enum Request { /// Requests additional peers from the server. /// /// # Response /// /// Returns [`Response::Peers`](super::Response::Peers). Peers, /// Heartbeats triggered on peer connection start. /// /// This is included as a bit of a hack, it should only be used /// internally for connection management. You should not expect to /// be firing or handling `Ping` requests or `Pong` responses. #[doc(hidden)] Ping(Nonce), /// Request block data by block hashes. /// /// This uses a `HashSet` rather than a `Vec` for two reasons. First, it /// automatically deduplicates the requested blocks. Second, the internal /// protocol translator needs to maintain a `HashSet` anyways, in order to /// keep track of which requested blocks have been received and when the /// request is ready. Rather than force the internals to always convert into /// a `HashSet`, we require the caller to pass one, so that if the caller /// didn't start with a `Vec` but with, e.g., an iterator, they can collect /// directly into a `HashSet` and save work. /// /// # Returns /// /// Returns [`Response::Blocks`](super::Response::Blocks). BlocksByHash(HashSet), /// Request block hashes of subsequent blocks in the chain, giving hashes of /// known blocks. /// /// # Returns /// /// Returns /// [`Response::BlockHashes`](super::Response::BlockHashes). /// /// # Warning /// /// This is implemented by sending a `getblocks` message. Bitcoin nodes /// respond to `getblocks` with an `inv` message containing a list of the /// subsequent blocks. However, Bitcoin nodes *also* send `inv` messages /// unsolicited in order to gossip new blocks to their peers. These gossip /// messages can race with the response to a `getblocks` request, and there /// is no way for the network layer to distinguish them. For this reason, the /// response may occasionally contain a single hash of a new chain tip rather /// than a list of hashes of subsequent blocks. We believe that unsolicited /// `inv` messages will always have exactly one block hash. FindBlocks { /// Hashes of known blocks, ordered from highest height to lowest height. known_blocks: Vec, /// Optionally, the last header to request. stop: Option, }, }